Left Termination proof of /tmp/tmpW8ImM5/quicksort-bf.pl

Left Termination of the query pattern qs_in_2(g, a) w.r.t. the given Prolog program could successfully be proven:

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

Clauses:

qs([], []).
qs(.(X, Xs), Ys) :- ','(part(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs), ','(qs(Littles, Ls), ','(qs(Bigs, Bs), app(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys)))).
part(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) :- ','(less(X, Y), part(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)).
part(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) :- part(X, Xs, Ls, Bs).
part(X, [], [], []).
app([], X, X).
app(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) :- app(Xs, Ys, Zs).
less(0, s(X)).
less(s(X), s(Y)) :- less(X, Y).

Queries:

qs(g,a).

We use the technique of [30]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes:
qs_in: (b,f)
part_in: (b,b,f,f)
less_in: (b,b)
app_in: (b,b,f)
Transforming Prolog into the following Term Rewriting System:
Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

qs_in_ga([], []) → qs_out_ga([], [])
qs_in_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys) → U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) → U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
less_in_gg(0, s(X)) → less_out_gg(0, s(X))
less_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_gg(X, Y, less_in_gg(X, Y))
U9_gg(X, Y, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → less_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) → U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, [], [], []) → part_out_ggaa(X, [], [], [])
U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs))
U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs)
U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)) → U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles, Ls))
U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Littles, Ls)) → U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_in_ga(Bigs, Bs))
U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bigs, Bs)) → U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_in_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys))
app_in_gga([], X, X) → app_out_gga([], X, X)
app_in_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) → U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_in_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs))
U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_out_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs)) → app_out_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs))
U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_out_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys)) → qs_out_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys)

Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiTRS implies Termination of Prolog

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

    ↳ PiTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

qs_in_ga([], []) → qs_out_ga([], [])
qs_in_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys) → U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) → U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
less_in_gg(0, s(X)) → less_out_gg(0, s(X))
less_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_gg(X, Y, less_in_gg(X, Y))
U9_gg(X, Y, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → less_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) → U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, [], [], []) → part_out_ggaa(X, [], [], [])
U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs))
U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs)
U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)) → U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles, Ls))
U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Littles, Ls)) → U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_in_ga(Bigs, Bs))
U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bigs, Bs)) → U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_in_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys))
app_in_gga([], X, X) → app_out_gga([], X, X)
app_in_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) → U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_in_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs))
U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_out_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs)) → app_out_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs))
U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_out_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys)) → qs_out_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys)

QS_IN_GA(.(X, Xs), Ys) → U1_GA(X, Xs, Ys, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs))
QS_IN_GA(.(X, Xs), Ys) → PART_IN_GGAA(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)
PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) → U5_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) → LESS_IN_GG(X, Y)
LESS_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_GG(X, Y, less_in_gg(X, Y))
LESS_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LESS_IN_GG(X, Y)
U5_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → U6_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
U5_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → PART_IN_GGAA(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)
PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) → U7_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) → PART_IN_GGAA(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)
U1_GA(X, Xs, Ys, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)) → U2_GA(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles, Ls))
U1_GA(X, Xs, Ys, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)) → QS_IN_GA(Littles, Ls)
U2_GA(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Littles, Ls)) → U3_GA(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_in_ga(Bigs, Bs))
U2_GA(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Littles, Ls)) → QS_IN_GA(Bigs, Bs)
U3_GA(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bigs, Bs)) → U4_GA(X, Xs, Ys, app_in_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys))
U3_GA(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bigs, Bs)) → APP_IN_GGA(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys)
APP_IN_GGA(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) → U8_GGA(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_in_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs))
APP_IN_GGA(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) → APP_IN_GGA(Xs, Ys, Zs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

qs_in_ga([], []) → qs_out_ga([], [])
qs_in_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys) → U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) → U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
less_in_gg(0, s(X)) → less_out_gg(0, s(X))
less_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_gg(X, Y, less_in_gg(X, Y))
U9_gg(X, Y, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → less_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) → U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, [], [], []) → part_out_ggaa(X, [], [], [])
U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs))
U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs)
U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)) → U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles, Ls))
U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Littles, Ls)) → U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_in_ga(Bigs, Bs))
U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bigs, Bs)) → U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_in_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys))
app_in_gga([], X, X) → app_out_gga([], X, X)
app_in_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) → U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_in_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs))
U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_out_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs)) → app_out_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs))
U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_out_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys)) → qs_out_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
qs_in_ga(x1, x2) = qs_in_ga(x1)
[] = []
qs_out_ga(x1, x2) = qs_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2) = .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4) = U1_ga(x1, x4)
part_in_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4) = part_in_ggaa(x1, x2)
U5_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = U5_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6)
less_in_gg(x1, x2) = less_in_gg(x1, x2)
0 = 0
s(x1) = s(x1)
less_out_gg(x1, x2) = less_out_gg
U9_gg(x1, x2, x3) = U9_gg(x3)
U6_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = U6_ggaa(x2, x6)
U7_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = U7_ggaa(x2, x6)
part_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4) = part_out_ggaa(x3, x4)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U2_ga(x1, x4, x5)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U3_ga(x1, x4, x5)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4) = U4_ga(x4)
app_in_gga(x1, x2, x3) = app_in_gga(x1, x2)
app_out_gga(x1, x2, x3) = app_out_gga(x3)
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U8_gga(x1, x5)
APP_IN_GGA(x1, x2, x3) = APP_IN_GGA(x1, x2)
QS_IN_GA(x1, x2) = QS_IN_GA(x1)
PART_IN_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4) = PART_IN_GGAA(x1, x2)
U6_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = U6_GGAA(x2, x6)
U5_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = U5_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x6)
U7_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = U7_GGAA(x2, x6)
U1_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4) = U1_GA(x1, x4)
U8_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U8_GGA(x1, x5)
LESS_IN_GG(x1, x2) = LESS_IN_GG(x1, x2)
U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U2_GA(x1, x4, x5)
U4_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4) = U4_GA(x4)
U9_GG(x1, x2, x3) = U9_GG(x3)
U3_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U3_GA(x1, x4, x5)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

    ↳ PiTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ PiDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

QS_IN_GA(.(X, Xs), Ys) → U1_GA(X, Xs, Ys, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs))
QS_IN_GA(.(X, Xs), Ys) → PART_IN_GGAA(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)
PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) → U5_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) → LESS_IN_GG(X, Y)
LESS_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_GG(X, Y, less_in_gg(X, Y))
LESS_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LESS_IN_GG(X, Y)
U5_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → U6_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
U5_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → PART_IN_GGAA(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)
PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) → U7_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) → PART_IN_GGAA(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)
U1_GA(X, Xs, Ys, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)) → U2_GA(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles, Ls))
U1_GA(X, Xs, Ys, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)) → QS_IN_GA(Littles, Ls)
U2_GA(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Littles, Ls)) → U3_GA(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_in_ga(Bigs, Bs))
U2_GA(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Littles, Ls)) → QS_IN_GA(Bigs, Bs)
U3_GA(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bigs, Bs)) → U4_GA(X, Xs, Ys, app_in_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys))
U3_GA(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bigs, Bs)) → APP_IN_GGA(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys)
APP_IN_GGA(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) → U8_GGA(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_in_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs))
APP_IN_GGA(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) → APP_IN_GGA(Xs, Ys, Zs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

qs_in_ga([], []) → qs_out_ga([], [])
qs_in_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys) → U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) → U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
less_in_gg(0, s(X)) → less_out_gg(0, s(X))
less_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_gg(X, Y, less_in_gg(X, Y))
U9_gg(X, Y, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → less_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) → U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, [], [], []) → part_out_ggaa(X, [], [], [])
U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs))
U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs)
U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)) → U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles, Ls))
U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Littles, Ls)) → U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_in_ga(Bigs, Bs))
U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bigs, Bs)) → U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_in_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys))
app_in_gga([], X, X) → app_out_gga([], X, X)
app_in_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) → U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_in_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs))
U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_out_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs)) → app_out_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs))
U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_out_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys)) → qs_out_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys)

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

    ↳ PiTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ PiDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ PiDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP_IN_GGA(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) → APP_IN_GGA(Xs, Ys, Zs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

qs_in_ga([], []) → qs_out_ga([], [])
qs_in_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys) → U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) → U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
less_in_gg(0, s(X)) → less_out_gg(0, s(X))
less_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_gg(X, Y, less_in_gg(X, Y))
U9_gg(X, Y, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → less_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) → U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, [], [], []) → part_out_ggaa(X, [], [], [])
U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs))
U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs)
U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)) → U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles, Ls))
U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Littles, Ls)) → U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_in_ga(Bigs, Bs))
U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bigs, Bs)) → U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_in_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys))
app_in_gga([], X, X) → app_out_gga([], X, X)
app_in_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) → U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_in_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs))
U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_out_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs)) → app_out_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs))
U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_out_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys)) → qs_out_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys)

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

    ↳ PiTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ PiDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ PiDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ PiDP

                    ↳ PiDPToQDPProof

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP_IN_GGA(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) → APP_IN_GGA(Xs, Ys, Zs)

R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(x1, x2) = .(x1, x2)
APP_IN_GGA(x1, x2, x3) = APP_IN_GGA(x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [30] into ordinary QDP problem [15] by application of Pi.

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

    ↳ PiTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ PiDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ PiDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ PiDP

                    ↳ PiDPToQDPProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP_IN_GGA(.(X, Xs), Ys) → APP_IN_GGA(Xs, Ys)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

APP_IN_GGA(.(X, Xs), Ys) → APP_IN_GGA(Xs, Ys)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

    ↳ PiTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ PiDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LESS_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LESS_IN_GG(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

qs_in_ga([], []) → qs_out_ga([], [])
qs_in_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys) → U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) → U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
less_in_gg(0, s(X)) → less_out_gg(0, s(X))
less_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_gg(X, Y, less_in_gg(X, Y))
U9_gg(X, Y, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → less_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) → U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, [], [], []) → part_out_ggaa(X, [], [], [])
U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs))
U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs)
U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)) → U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles, Ls))
U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Littles, Ls)) → U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_in_ga(Bigs, Bs))
U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bigs, Bs)) → U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_in_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys))
app_in_gga([], X, X) → app_out_gga([], X, X)
app_in_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) → U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_in_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs))
U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_out_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs)) → app_out_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs))
U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_out_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys)) → qs_out_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys)

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

    ↳ PiTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ PiDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ PiDP

                    ↳ PiDPToQDPProof

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LESS_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LESS_IN_GG(X, Y)

R is empty.
Pi is empty.
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [30] into ordinary QDP problem [15] by application of Pi.

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

    ↳ PiTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ PiDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ PiDP

                    ↳ PiDPToQDPProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LESS_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LESS_IN_GG(X, Y)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

LESS_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LESS_IN_GG(X, Y)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

    ↳ PiTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ PiDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ PiDP

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U5_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → PART_IN_GGAA(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)
PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) → U5_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) → PART_IN_GGAA(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

qs_in_ga([], []) → qs_out_ga([], [])
qs_in_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys) → U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) → U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
less_in_gg(0, s(X)) → less_out_gg(0, s(X))
less_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_gg(X, Y, less_in_gg(X, Y))
U9_gg(X, Y, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → less_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) → U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, [], [], []) → part_out_ggaa(X, [], [], [])
U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs))
U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs)
U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)) → U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles, Ls))
U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Littles, Ls)) → U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_in_ga(Bigs, Bs))
U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bigs, Bs)) → U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_in_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys))
app_in_gga([], X, X) → app_out_gga([], X, X)
app_in_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) → U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_in_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs))
U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_out_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs)) → app_out_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs))
U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_out_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys)) → qs_out_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
qs_in_ga(x1, x2) = qs_in_ga(x1)
[] = []
qs_out_ga(x1, x2) = qs_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2) = .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4) = U1_ga(x1, x4)
part_in_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4) = part_in_ggaa(x1, x2)
U5_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = U5_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6)
less_in_gg(x1, x2) = less_in_gg(x1, x2)
0 = 0
s(x1) = s(x1)
less_out_gg(x1, x2) = less_out_gg
U9_gg(x1, x2, x3) = U9_gg(x3)
U6_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = U6_ggaa(x2, x6)
U7_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = U7_ggaa(x2, x6)
part_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4) = part_out_ggaa(x3, x4)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U2_ga(x1, x4, x5)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U3_ga(x1, x4, x5)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4) = U4_ga(x4)
app_in_gga(x1, x2, x3) = app_in_gga(x1, x2)
app_out_gga(x1, x2, x3) = app_out_gga(x3)
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U8_gga(x1, x5)
PART_IN_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4) = PART_IN_GGAA(x1, x2)
U5_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = U5_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [30] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

    ↳ PiTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ PiDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ PiDP

                    ↳ PiDPToQDPProof

              ↳ PiDP

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U5_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → PART_IN_GGAA(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)
PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) → U5_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) → PART_IN_GGAA(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

less_in_gg(0, s(X)) → less_out_gg(0, s(X))
less_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_gg(X, Y, less_in_gg(X, Y))
U9_gg(X, Y, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → less_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(x1, x2) = .(x1, x2)
less_in_gg(x1, x2) = less_in_gg(x1, x2)
0 = 0
s(x1) = s(x1)
less_out_gg(x1, x2) = less_out_gg
U9_gg(x1, x2, x3) = U9_gg(x3)
PART_IN_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4) = PART_IN_GGAA(x1, x2)
U5_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = U5_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [30] into ordinary QDP problem [15] by application of Pi.

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

    ↳ PiTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ PiDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ PiDP

                    ↳ PiDPToQDPProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

              ↳ PiDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs)) → PART_IN_GGAA(X, Xs)
U5_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, less_out_gg) → PART_IN_GGAA(X, Xs)
PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs)) → U5_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, less_in_gg(X, Y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

less_in_gg(0, s(X)) → less_out_gg
less_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_gg(less_in_gg(X, Y))
U9_gg(less_out_gg) → less_out_gg

The set Q consists of the following terms:

less_in_gg(x0, x1)
U9_gg(x0)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs)) → U5_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2, 2 > 3
PART_IN_GGAA(X, .(Y, Xs)) → PART_IN_GGAA(X, Xs)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
U5_GGAA(X, Y, Xs, less_out_gg) → PART_IN_GGAA(X, Xs)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 3 >= 2

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

    ↳ PiTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ PiDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

                ↳ PiDPToQDPProof

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

QS_IN_GA(.(X, Xs), Ys) → U1_GA(X, Xs, Ys, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs))
U1_GA(X, Xs, Ys, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)) → QS_IN_GA(Littles, Ls)
U1_GA(X, Xs, Ys, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)) → U2_GA(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles, Ls))
U2_GA(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Littles, Ls)) → QS_IN_GA(Bigs, Bs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

qs_in_ga([], []) → qs_out_ga([], [])
qs_in_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys) → U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs) → U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
less_in_gg(0, s(X)) → less_out_gg(0, s(X))
less_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_gg(X, Y, less_in_gg(X, Y))
U9_gg(X, Y, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → less_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, less_out_gg(X, Y)) → U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs)) → U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs))
part_in_ggaa(X, [], [], []) → part_out_ggaa(X, [], [], [])
U7_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), Ls, .(Y, Bs))
U6_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, Ls, Bs, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs), .(Y, Ls), Bs)
U1_ga(X, Xs, Ys, part_out_ggaa(X, Xs, Littles, Bigs)) → U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles, Ls))
U2_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Littles, Ls)) → U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_in_ga(Bigs, Bs))
U3_ga(X, Xs, Ys, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bigs, Bs)) → U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_in_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys))
app_in_gga([], X, X) → app_out_gga([], X, X)
app_in_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) → U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_in_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs))
U8_gga(X, Xs, Ys, Zs, app_out_gga(Xs, Ys, Zs)) → app_out_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs))
U4_ga(X, Xs, Ys, app_out_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs), Ys)) → qs_out_ga(.(X, Xs), Ys)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
qs_in_ga(x1, x2) = qs_in_ga(x1)
[] = []
qs_out_ga(x1, x2) = qs_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2) = .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4) = U1_ga(x1, x4)
part_in_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4) = part_in_ggaa(x1, x2)
U5_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = U5_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6)
less_in_gg(x1, x2) = less_in_gg(x1, x2)
0 = 0
s(x1) = s(x1)
less_out_gg(x1, x2) = less_out_gg
U9_gg(x1, x2, x3) = U9_gg(x3)
U6_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = U6_ggaa(x2, x6)
U7_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = U7_ggaa(x2, x6)
part_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4) = part_out_ggaa(x3, x4)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U2_ga(x1, x4, x5)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U3_ga(x1, x4, x5)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4) = U4_ga(x4)
app_in_gga(x1, x2, x3) = app_in_gga(x1, x2)
app_out_gga(x1, x2, x3) = app_out_gga(x3)
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U8_gga(x1, x5)
QS_IN_GA(x1, x2) = QS_IN_GA(x1)
U1_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4) = U1_GA(x1, x4)
U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U2_GA(x1, x4, x5)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [30] into ordinary QDP problem [15] by application of Pi.

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

    ↳ PiTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ PiDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

                ↳ PiDPToQDPProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

QS_IN_GA(.(X, Xs)) → U1_GA(X, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs))
U2_GA(X, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Ls)) → QS_IN_GA(Bigs)
U1_GA(X, part_out_ggaa(Littles, Bigs)) → U2_GA(X, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles))
U1_GA(X, part_out_ggaa(Littles, Bigs)) → QS_IN_GA(Littles)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

qs_in_ga([]) → qs_out_ga([])
qs_in_ga(.(X, Xs)) → U1_ga(X, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs)) → U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
less_in_gg(0, s(X)) → less_out_gg
less_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_gg(less_in_gg(X, Y))
U9_gg(less_out_gg) → less_out_gg
U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, less_out_gg) → U6_ggaa(Y, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs)) → U7_ggaa(Y, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs))
part_in_ggaa(X, []) → part_out_ggaa([], [])
U7_ggaa(Y, part_out_ggaa(Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(Ls, .(Y, Bs))
U6_ggaa(Y, part_out_ggaa(Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(.(Y, Ls), Bs)
U1_ga(X, part_out_ggaa(Littles, Bigs)) → U2_ga(X, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles))
U2_ga(X, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Ls)) → U3_ga(X, Ls, qs_in_ga(Bigs))
U3_ga(X, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bs)) → U4_ga(app_in_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs)))
app_in_gga([], X) → app_out_gga(X)
app_in_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys) → U8_gga(X, app_in_gga(Xs, Ys))
U8_gga(X, app_out_gga(Zs)) → app_out_gga(.(X, Zs))
U4_ga(app_out_gga(Ys)) → qs_out_ga(Ys)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

qs_in_ga(x0)
part_in_ggaa(x0, x1)
less_in_gg(x0, x1)
U9_gg(x0)
U5_ggaa(x0, x1, x2, x3)
U7_ggaa(x0, x1)
U6_ggaa(x0, x1)
U1_ga(x0, x1)
U2_ga(x0, x1, x2)
U3_ga(x0, x1, x2)
app_in_gga(x0, x1)
U8_gga(x0, x1)
U4_ga(x0)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U1_GA(X, part_out_ggaa(Littles, Bigs)) → U2_GA(X, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles))
U1_GA(X, part_out_ggaa(Littles, Bigs)) → QS_IN_GA(Littles)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

QS_IN_GA(.(X, Xs)) → U1_GA(X, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs))
U2_GA(X, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Ls)) → QS_IN_GA(Bigs)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(.(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(0) = 0
POL(QS_IN_GA(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(U1_GA(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(U1_ga(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(U2_GA(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₂ + x₃
POL(U2_ga(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₂
POL(U3_ga(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₃
POL(U4_ga(x₁)) = 1
POL(U5_ggaa(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄)) = 1 + x₃ + x₄
POL(U6_ggaa(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(U7_ggaa(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(U8_gga(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U9_gg(x₁)) = 1
POL([]) = 0
POL(app_in_gga(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(app_out_gga(x₁)) = 0
POL(less_in_gg(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(less_out_gg) = 1
POL(part_in_ggaa(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(part_out_ggaa(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(qs_in_ga(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(qs_out_ga(x₁)) = 1
POL(s(x₁)) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

U3_ga(X, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bs)) → U4_ga(app_in_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs)))
qs_in_ga(.(X, Xs)) → U1_ga(X, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs))
U9_gg(less_out_gg) → less_out_gg
U4_ga(app_out_gga(Ys)) → qs_out_ga(Ys)
U7_ggaa(Y, part_out_ggaa(Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(Ls, .(Y, Bs))
qs_in_ga([]) → qs_out_ga([])
U6_ggaa(Y, part_out_ggaa(Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(.(Y, Ls), Bs)
less_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_gg(less_in_gg(X, Y))
less_in_gg(0, s(X)) → less_out_gg
U1_ga(X, part_out_ggaa(Littles, Bigs)) → U2_ga(X, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs)) → U7_ggaa(Y, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs)) → U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
U2_ga(X, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Ls)) → U3_ga(X, Ls, qs_in_ga(Bigs))
U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, less_out_gg) → U6_ggaa(Y, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs))
part_in_ggaa(X, []) → part_out_ggaa([], [])

↳ Prolog

  ↳ PrologToPiTRSProof

    ↳ PiTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ PiDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

              ↳ PiDP

                ↳ PiDPToQDPProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

QS_IN_GA(.(X, Xs)) → U1_GA(X, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs))
U2_GA(X, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Ls)) → QS_IN_GA(Bigs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

qs_in_ga([]) → qs_out_ga([])
qs_in_ga(.(X, Xs)) → U1_ga(X, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs)) → U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, less_in_gg(X, Y))
less_in_gg(0, s(X)) → less_out_gg
less_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U9_gg(less_in_gg(X, Y))
U9_gg(less_out_gg) → less_out_gg
U5_ggaa(X, Y, Xs, less_out_gg) → U6_ggaa(Y, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs))
part_in_ggaa(X, .(Y, Xs)) → U7_ggaa(Y, part_in_ggaa(X, Xs))
part_in_ggaa(X, []) → part_out_ggaa([], [])
U7_ggaa(Y, part_out_ggaa(Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(Ls, .(Y, Bs))
U6_ggaa(Y, part_out_ggaa(Ls, Bs)) → part_out_ggaa(.(Y, Ls), Bs)
U1_ga(X, part_out_ggaa(Littles, Bigs)) → U2_ga(X, Bigs, qs_in_ga(Littles))
U2_ga(X, Bigs, qs_out_ga(Ls)) → U3_ga(X, Ls, qs_in_ga(Bigs))
U3_ga(X, Ls, qs_out_ga(Bs)) → U4_ga(app_in_gga(Ls, .(X, Bs)))
app_in_gga([], X) → app_out_gga(X)
app_in_gga(.(X, Xs), Ys) → U8_gga(X, app_in_gga(Xs, Ys))
U8_gga(X, app_out_gga(Zs)) → app_out_gga(.(X, Zs))
U4_ga(app_out_gga(Ys)) → qs_out_ga(Ys)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

qs_in_ga(x0)
part_in_ggaa(x0, x1)
less_in_gg(x0, x1)
U9_gg(x0)
U5_ggaa(x0, x1, x2, x3)
U7_ggaa(x0, x1)
U6_ggaa(x0, x1)
U1_ga(x0, x1)
U2_ga(x0, x1, x2)
U3_ga(x0, x1, x2)
app_in_gga(x0, x1)
U8_gga(x0, x1)
U4_ga(x0)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.